Protecting Your Bold Brand from Perceived Connections, Unnoticed Infringement, and Good Intentions
The only thing worse than being copied is being caught unprepared when you’re copied. Let’s talk about inspiration versus infringement and being proactive about protecting your brand's most valuable asset: your trademark.
It's a common, and very human, assumption: if you're the original, if your idea is truly yours, the law will naturally be on your side. Surely, your groundbreaking concept or unique service offering counts for something. And yes, your originality does count, profoundly. But as countless creative entrepreneurs, innovative service providers, and even music legends have learned, the line between homage and infringement is often razor-thin. And the crucial, sometimes painful, truth is that good intentions—whether yours or someone else's—won't shelter you from legal storms if the right protections aren't firmly in place.
The "Simply Tina" Wake-Up Call: A Masterclass in Trademark Diligence
The recent "Simply Tina" trademark dispute is a powerful wake-up call for anyone diligently building a reputation, platform, or audience. This case involves a tribute band that operates as an homage to the iconic Queen of Rock and Roll, Tina Turner. Yet, when the band sought to solidify its presence by filing an application to register "Simply Tina" as a federal trademark, Tina Turner’s estate swiftly intervened, filing an opposition to block the registration.
This wasn’t a question of whether the band sounded exactly like Turner herself, or even if audiences literally confused a live tribute show with a performance by the legendary artist (especially after her passing). Instead, the core legal question revolved around a concept of "likelihood of confusion"—a concern magnified when a more famous or recognizable mark is involved. That is, would audiences mistakenly believe there was an official connection, sponsorship, or endorsement between Tina Turner’s estate and the tribute band if "Simply Tina" were allowed to register its name? This principle—preventing consumers from being confused about the source of goods or services—is the bedrock of trademark law.
And while the law puts an an emphasis on the rights holder having a famous mark when we’re talking about claims of dilution of a mark (where unauthorized use of a famous mark, even for unrelated goods or services, can weaken its distinctiveness or harm its reputation), I want you to shift your perspective and do the due diligence in terms of your mark or brand being highly important to you and famous in its own right to your audience.
This means protecting it proactively, so that as you grow, it is unmistakable that you are solely attributable as the source of whatever products and services originate from that brand. You secure it so that no one else can use your brand without your explicit permission or proper licensing now, or when you "blow up" and your visibility grows more and more. This proactive approach isn't about being famous already; it's about building a foundation for fame and ensuring your future success is unassailable.
I addressed some of the intricate issues surrounding this actual dispute, delving into the nuances, in a recent C-Suite Legal Lounge™ podcast episode, but I also highlighted some of the common brand protection misconceptions and lessons regarding the roles and positions of the parties involved (e.g., an original brand owner versus the inspired admirer). While there are enough facets of this case to fill months of discussion, here, I want to unpack three related critical issues that I consistently see surfacing with my clients and community. These are not just legal points; they are vital reflections for your entrepreneurial journey.
Three Related Reflections
from the "Simply Tina" Trademark Dispute:
Inspiration, Perceived Connection, and Protection
This dispute brought to mind three related vital truths about brand protection
that every bold entrepreneur, business owner, and creator needs to grasp:
1. Good Intentions Are Not a Legal Shield: The Peril of a "Perceived Connection" (Even with Attribution).
It’s "all good" if someone gives you a shout-out or talks about being inspired by you, right? Perhaps they even use a version of your name or version of your offer in a part of what they offer, thinking it's harmless or even flattering. You may still think it's all good. Until... that "someone" files a trademark under your name or something confusingly similar, or their use begins to dilute the distinctiveness and power of your brand.
The lesson here is profound: giving attribution or stating "no affiliation" often isn't enough to prevent trademark infringement, because trademark law focuses squarely on the consumer's perception of a "perceived connection."
This "perceived connection" is the silent legal trigger. If the use of a similar mark by another party creates a likelihood that consumers might believe there's an affiliation to your brand—even if it's a false connection, a mistaken belief of endorsement, or a perceived association that doesn't actually exist—that's where infringement occurs. Your trademark identifies you as the unique source of your offerings. When others use it, even "respectfully" or with what they believe are good intentions, it can muddy the waters, erode your unique position in the market, and lead to significant legal challenges.
A Little Background on "Inspired By" and Perceived Connection Issues:
The concept of being "inspired by" someone is fundamental to creativity. However, in the realm of commercial brands and trademarks, inspiration must not cross the line into creating a "perceived connection" to the original source. This problem arises when a brand name, logo, or even a service offering is so similar to an established one that a reasonable consumer might, for example:
- Believe the new business is an official branch or licensee of the original.
- Assume the original brand has endorsed or sponsored the new business.
- Think the new offering is part of the original brand's product line.
- Become confused about who is actually providing the service or goods.
This perceived connection isn't just about direct copying; it's about the impression created in the marketplace.
reflection for your business
Reflection for Your Business: Imagine you run "Bloomed Flower Business Coaching," known for your signature "B.L.O.O.M. Framework Principles." A new coach launches a business called "Blooming Success Strategies." While she attributes her inspiration to you, talks about how her framework follows your principles, or even says she was a student of one of your programs — she now calls her program "B.L.O.O.M.I.N.G. Success Strategies." If her programming and resources are similar and marketed to the same audience, your potential clients might believe you've endorsed her, or that her business is an official branch of yours. This isn't just frustrating; it's potentially damaging to your brand's integrity, your unique value proposition, and ultimately, your bottom line because your carefully cultivated "connection" to your clients is now diluted or confused.
2. Flying Under the Radar is a Risky Flight Path
(for everyone involved):
The Bigger You Get, the Harder You Fall.
Many entrepreneurs, especially when starting out, might inadvertently use a name or element in their brand that's a bit too close to an existing mark—perhaps similar to the use in the scenario above—or perhaps because they didn’t conduct a proper search. Or, perhaps more dangerously, they might knowingly infringe, hoping to ride on the coattails of a bigger brand, thinking they're "too small" to be noticed.
If you are infringing, even unintentionally, it doesn't mean you won't pay the price. In fact, the bigger you get—the more visibility you gain, the more collaborations you expand into, the larger your audience becomes—the more attention you bring to your business. And if that business is built on infringement, the harder you'll fall. Why? Because increased visibility often correlates with increased revenue, which directly translates into a higher basis for potential damages in a legal claim. A rights holder can potentially pursue multiple counts of infringement, making the legal and financial consequences exponentially higher and often devastating.
Also, make sure to listen the podcast episode where I tell you why being "small" actually makes you a bigger target.
reflection for your business
So in your reflection, I want you to look at it from the perspective of the infringer and the rights holder.
Reflection for Your Business
(The Infringer's Perspective):
Let's consider a scenario where you've been using a name, perhaps because you didn't do a proper search, or you knowingly adopted something too close. You've seemingly gone unnoticed for a while or haven't been made aware of someone else's prior claim to rights. You've built your brand, invested in marketing, and established a loyal following under this name. Now, with your increased visibility, you become a clear target. What started as a small, unnoticed overlap can quickly escalate into a full-blown lawsuit demanding rebranding, damages, and lost profits—a devastating blow to a thriving business built on unrecognized risk.
Reflection for Your Business
(The Rights Holder's Perspective):
Now, let’s look at this from the other side. You have to be on the lookout for others who may be flying under the radar and address their infringement, even if they are small. You never know if that small, unnoticed business is going to become a larger competitor and potentially even overtake you in your industry. If you delay enforcement, you could face the costly dilemma of having to rebrand your own established business or enter into a protracted, expensive legal battle, even though you had prior rights. Your inaction can send a powerful signal to potential infringers that you are not serious about protecting your brand, making you a soft target for future encroachment.
3. Recognition Isn't Protection:
You Must Enforce and Register Your Rights.
You're well-known for what you do. Your clients rave about you, and your reputation precedes you. Surely, that's enough to protect your brand, right? Not in the eyes of the law. Popularity, visibility, and even widespread recognition only go so far, particularly if those rights are only based on "common law" use, which are often geographically limited and harder to prove.
In the eyes of US law, federal trademark registration—not just flattery or attribution—is what truly grants you the right to secure, defend, and grow your brand across the nation. Federal registration provides a powerful legal presumption of ownership nationwide, which is crucial evidence if you ever need to enforce your rights.
And, if you are not making a proactive effort to protect and enforce your rights, others may perceive this as an invitation to "swoop in" and use your name or a similar mark. They might genuinely feel it's okay because they don't see you taking action. This can diminish your brand's distinctiveness, weaken its unique position as the source identifier, and complicate your ability to expand and protect it later.
You absolutely have to enforce your rights. You can't let someone use your brand in their brand, even if they claim they're just making a reference to a certification, software, platform, etc. they have received or purchased from you. It’s not harmless. It looks like you are endorsing them, creates confusion, and worse, can potentially lock you out of a market you want to expand into because their unchallenged use could become a significant barrier to entry for you.
This is why a comprehensive trademark search before you file, and consistent monitoring and enforcement of your trademark rights after you register, are non-negotiable responsibilities of a trademark owner. If you don't actively police your marks, you risk losing them or seeing your brand's distinctiveness diluted over time.
To Summarize...The Lesson That Applies Directly to You?
Secure Your Brilliance
Here’s the undeniable lesson that applies to you, whether you’re coaching clients, dropping transformative courses, hosting showstopping events, or running a beloved local business: Proactively protect your brand! You cannot, and must not, let people slide when it comes to protecting your brand. When others use your mark without your permission, even under the guise of 'inspiration,' it actively diminishes your brand's distinctiveness and weakens your unique position as the definitive source identifier.
Your popularity, visibility, and even widespread recognition are powerful assets, but they are not the ultimate shield. Don’t rely on recognition, goodwill, or disclaimers to truly shield your business. Prioritize federal trademark registration before your brand becomes your most valuable—and potentially most vulnerable—asset.
It’s not just about stopping copycats. It’s about strategically preparing your business for sustainable growth, seamless expansion, potential investment, and a lasting legacy. Creating a recognizable brand may get you started, but only bold brand protection action puts your stake firmly in the ground, ensuring your brilliance is secured, not just seen.
Ask Yourself These Critical Questions for Reflection
To take proactive control of your brand's future, use these questions as a powerful reflection point. They are designed to help you identify blind spots and empower you to take the necessary steps to secure your legacy:
Assumption Check: Am I operating under the assumption that my brand is sufficiently protected just because people know me, I’ve been in business for a while, or I'm widely recognized as a leader in my niche?
Recourse Reality: If I discovered someone using a name or mark identical or highly similar to mine in another city, state, or for a different but related service, what real, enforceable legal recourse would I have right now without federal registration? What proof would I need to gather?
Peace of Mind & Value: How would a forced rebrand—due to a trademark dispute I could have prevented—impact my emotional peace of mind, my team's morale, my client relationships, and my business’s hard-earned market value?
Search Diligence: Beyond a quick Google search or social media check, have I invested in a truly comprehensive trademark search performed by a professional who understands the nuances of the USPTO database and common law uses? If not, what specific risks might I be overlooking regarding potential infringement by my brand?
Enforcement Mindset: Am I consistently monitoring my brand's use in the marketplace? What is my current plan for addressing potential infringement, even by smaller entities? Do I have a "don't let it slide" approach, or am I unintentionally sending a signal of lax enforcement, inviting others to create a "perceived connection" to my brand without my consent?
Future-Proofing: Am I letting fear of perceived legal costs or complexity deter me from taking this essential, long-term step that could prevent exponentially larger problems down the road? How does this decision align with my vision for sustainable growth and a lasting legacy?
Brand Integrity (Perceived Connection): How might others using my brand name, framework titles, or even referring to my certifications or resources, dilute the distinctiveness of my mark and confuse my ideal clients about the true source of my expertise and offerings, creating an unauthorized "perceived connection"?
Expansion Readiness: Am I inadvertently building a future barrier to my own market expansion by not fully securing my brand's name and identity before I'm ready to get become more visible or enter new territories, particularly if someone else's "inspired by" use creates confusion or blocks my path?
Your brand is too important to leave unprotected.
Let’s make sure it’s legally yours, unequivocally.
STAY TUNED...Next up in the series:
Setting the Stage for a Battle Royale: There are two Simply Tina Tribute Bands? How Does That Work Legally?
Ready to Secure Your Brilliance?
The reflections I've shared here illuminate the path to powerful protection. If you're ready to move beyond insight and take decisive action to build boldly, protect, and flourish – safeguarding your legacy and your unique energy – then let's get you positioned.
Join me for my live masterclass, Trademarks and Trailblazers Series: That Name Sounds Familiar…And That’s the Legal Problem (What the Tina Turner/Simply Tina Trademark Case Means for Your Brand’s Future) Register Below. We'll deep dive into these nuances, perform mini-audits, and craft your personalized brand protection blueprint.
Want to explore how to proactively protect your unique offers and intellectual property? Discover my Brand Protection Audits, VIP Intensives, and Trademark Registration services. Book A Consultation
Join us for our next brand protection workshop!
Trademarks and Trailblazers Masterclass Series
That Name Sounds Familiar...and that's the legal problem
What the Tina Turner Trademark Dispute Means for Your Brand’s Future
What happens when your brand name sounds a little too familiar? Join me for a live workshop breaking down the Simply Tina trademark dispute—and what it means for entrepreneurs naming offers, experiences, and businesses in today’s visibility-driven world. You’ll walk away with real legal clarity, a step-by-step name risk test, and the strategy to protect your brilliance before someone else tries to claim it.
Wednesday, July 16th | 6:00pm CT/ 7:00pm ET
Affiliate Disclaimer: Some of the links in this article may be affiliate links, meaning I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products and services that I genuinely believe in and think will benefit you. Your support helps me continue providing valuable content. Thank you!
© 2020-2025 TMF FITUNATE LLC. All Rights Reserved.
TONIAFISHER.COM, TMF COLLECTIVE™, THE CULTURE IS LOCAL™, TCIL C-SUITE™, VIBRANTLY CLEAR™, and FIT POWERFULLY™ are owned by TMF FITUNATE LLC and are not law firms. While I am an attorney, I am not your attorney and nothing on this website, downloads, or content available, nor any purchases made on this website, are to be construed as creating an attorney-client relationship. Additionally, nothing in this site or resources made available are to be considered legal advice. Content and resources provided on this site are meant for educational and informational purposes only. If you need specific legal advice, consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction who specializes in your subject matter.